HCM GROUP

HCM Group 

HCM Group 

Talent Acquisition 

sitting man using laptop near woman sitting beside table
25 April 2025

Structured vs. Unstructured Interviews: Which Approach Yields Better Hires?

1. Introduction: The Role of Interviews in Hiring

Interviews remain a cornerstone of candidate selection, but their effectiveness varies dramatically depending on how they are conducted. While unstructured interviews allow for free-flowing discussions, structured interviews provide consistency and fairness.

 

Key Question: Which approach leads to better hiring decisions—structured or unstructured interviews?

Companies like Google, Amazon, and Deloitte have shifted towards structured interviews due to their ability to reduce bias and improve hiring accuracy. This guide examines the differences between the two approaches, their impact on hiring outcomes, and how organizations can implement best practices to optimize their interview processes.

 

2. Understanding Unstructured Interviews: The Traditional Approach

What Are Unstructured Interviews?

Unstructured interviews follow no predetermined set of questions or scoring criteria. Instead, interviewers engage in open-ended conversations, often tailoring questions to each candidate based on their resume or responses.

This approach allows for flexibility, but it comes with significant drawbacks:

 

Pros of Unstructured Interviews

  • Personalized conversations create a comfortable atmosphere for candidates.
  • Opportunity for spontaneity allows interviewers to explore unique aspects of a candidate’s background.
  • More natural dialogue can make candidates feel at ease.

 

Cons of Unstructured Interviews

  • Lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare candidates fairly.
  • Higher bias risk, as interviewers rely on intuition rather than objective criteria.
  • Lower predictive validity, meaning they do not accurately forecast job performance.

 

Why Companies Are Moving Away from Unstructured Interviews

While unstructured interviews remain common, leading organizations are recognizing their flaws. Studies show they are only about 14% effective in predicting job performance. As a result, companies like Google, Amazon, and McKinsey have abandoned them in favor of structured interviews.

 

3. Structured Interviews: The Science of Hiring Fairly

What Are Structured Interviews?

Structured interviews follow a standardized process where:

  • All candidates answer the same set of predetermined questions.
  • Responses are scored using a clear evaluation framework.
  • Interviewers receive training to ensure consistency.

This approach ensures fairness, reduces bias, and significantly improves hiring accuracy.

 

Pros of Structured Interviews

  • Higher predictive validity, making them up to twice as effective as unstructured interviews.
  • Fairer evaluation, reducing unconscious bias.
  • Consistency, allowing for easier comparison between candidates.

 

Cons of Structured Interviews

  • Less conversational compared to unstructured interviews.
  • More preparation required to develop standardized questions and scoring criteria.

 

How Leading Companies Use Structured Interviews

  • Google implemented structured interviews and saw a 40% improvement in hiring accuracy.
  • Amazon uses behavioral-based structured interviews to ensure fair candidate assessments.
  • Deloitte applies structured interviews to minimize bias in leadership hiring.

 

  1. Structured vs. Unstructured Interviews: Which Performs Better?

 

Factor

Structured Interviews

Unstructured Interviews

Predictive Validity

Higher (0.57 - 0.63)

Lower (0.14 - 0.20)

Fairness & Bias Reduction

Strong—consistent & objective

Weak—high risk of bias

Candidate Experience

More standardized but fair

More natural but inconsistent

Comparison of Candidates

Easy—responses are scored

Difficult—subjective impressions

 

5. Tools for Implementing Structured Interviews

To optimize structured interviews, many companies use technology-driven assessment tools:

 

Interview Structuring & Evaluation Tools

  • Xobin – Used by Amazon for competency-based structured interviews, ensuring consistency across hiring teams.
  • Harrison Assessments – Implemented by Coca-Cola to improve interview objectivity and fairness.

 

AI-Powered Interview Tools

  • HireVue – Uses AI to analyze video interviews and assess candidates based on facial expressions, tone, and responses. KPMG integrates HireVue to enhance structured interview accuracy.
  • Modern Hire – Applies predictive analytics to structured interview data. Deloitte leverages this tool for leadership hiring.

These tools help organizations standardize interviews, remove bias, and improve hiring decisions.

 

6. Implementing Structured Interviews in Your Organization

 

Step 1: Define Key Competencies

Before developing interview questions, identify the core competencies needed for the role. These may include problem-solving, leadership, teamwork, or technical skills.

 

Step 2: Develop Standardized Questions

Create a mix of:

  • Behavioral questions (e.g., “Tell me about a time you handled conflict in a team.”)
  • Situational questions (e.g., “How would you approach a project deadline that is at risk?”)

 

Step 3: Establish a Scoring System

Define clear rating scales for evaluating responses. A five-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) helps ensure consistency.

 

Step 4: Train Interviewers

Ensure hiring managers understand structured interview techniques and the importance of objective evaluation.

 

Step 5: Use Technology to Enhance Consistency

Leverage AI-powered tools (e.g., HireVue, Modern Hire) or structured evaluation platforms (e.g., Xobin, Harrison Assessments) to support structured interviews.

 

7. The Future of Interviewing: AI and Data-Driven Hiring

Emerging Trends in Structured Interviews

  • AI-Powered Assessments – Companies like Unilever use AI-driven interviews to analyze verbal and non-verbal cues.
  • Neuroscience-Based Hiring – Brainwave analysis is emerging as a next-generation hiring tool.
  • Gamification – Organizations like PwC use interactive simulations in structured interviews.

 

While these innovations will enhance structured interviews, the core principles—standardization, fairness, and predictive accuracy—remain critical to effective hiring.

 

8. Conclusion: Structured Interviews Are the Future of Hiring

The evidence is clear: structured interviews consistently outperform unstructured interviews in hiring accuracy, fairness, and efficiency.

Leading companies—including Google, Amazon, Deloitte, and Coca-Cola—have transitioned to structured interviews to ensure data-driven, bias-free hiring.

By adopting structured interviews and leveraging AI-powered tools, HR leaders can improve candidate selection, reduce turnover, and build high-performing teams.

 

Key Takeaways:

 

  • Structured interviews have higher predictive accuracy than unstructured interviews.
  • Leading companies use structured interviews to reduce bias and improve hiring outcomes.
  • Tools like Xobin, HireVue, and Modern Hire enhance structured interview consistency.
  • The future of interviewing lies in AI, gamification, and data-driven hiring.

 

For organizations seeking to enhance hiring success, structured interviews are the gold standard.

kontakt@hcm-group.pl

883-373-766

Website created in white label responsive website builder WebWave.