HCM GROUP

HCM Group 

HCM Group 

BACK

silhouette of road signage during golden hour
22 May 2025

How to Establish Decision-Making Without Managers

Introduction: Rethinking Control in Self-Organized Systems

In traditional hierarchies, authority and decision-making are typically reserved for designated managers. However, in self-managed and decentralized organizations (such as those embracing Holacracy or Teal principles), decision-making authority is distributed across roles and teams. The goal is not to eliminate structure, but to replace command-and-control models with dynamic, transparent, and participatory decision processes.

This guide explores how to design and implement effective decision-making systems without relying on managerial oversight. Whether you're transforming a department or a whole enterprise, the key is to embed clarity, accountability, and trust into how decisions are made.

 

1. Understand the Core Principles of Distributed Decision-Making

Before redesigning your processes, you must ground your efforts in key principles:

 

Overview: Distributed decision-making isn't about chaos or free-for-all choices. It's based on clearly defined roles, boundaries, and mutual accountability. Understanding its philosophical foundation will prevent missteps during implementation.

 

Core Principles:

  • Clarity Over Control: Everyone understands who decides what and why.
  • Transparency: Decisions, data, and rationales are visible to all.
  • Consent, Not Consensus: Decisions move forward unless there's a reasoned objection.
  • Roles Over People: Authority is tied to roles, not individuals.
  • Evolutionary Purpose: Decisions serve the organization’s broader purpose, not individual preferences.

 

Example: In a Teal company like Buurtzorg (a Dutch healthcare organization), nurses manage patient care decisions within self-managing teams, using shared protocols instead of supervisor approval.

 

2. Map Decision Domains and Authority Boundaries

 

Overview: To avoid confusion, organizations need to clearly define who has authority over which types of decisions. This eliminates the need for managerial approval chains.

 

Steps:

  • Catalog Key Decision Areas: Budgeting, hiring, product design, customer escalation, etc.
  • Assign Decision Domains to Roles or Circles: Use tools like RACI or Holacratic role definitions.
  • Define Constraints and Escalation Paths: When does a decision require wider consultation? What limits (e.g., budget thresholds) exist?

 

Example: In a self-managing HR team, hiring decisions might be made by a recruiting role, constrained by agreed-upon compensation bands and cultural criteria established by the team.

 

3. Adopt Structured Decision-Making Protocols

 

Overview: Without managers, teams need decision frameworks to replace informal or top-down styles. These methods help ensure fairness, clarity, and speed.

 

Popular Protocols:

  • Advice Process (Frederic Laloux): Anyone can make a decision after seeking advice from those affected and those with expertise.
  • Integrative Decision-Making (Holacracy): Proposals are processed through a structured dialogue to address objections constructively.
  • Consent Decision-Making (Sociocracy): Decisions move forward if there's no reasoned objection, not based on full agreement.

 

Example: A marketing team member wants to shift advertising strategy. She consults peers in sales and finance (advice process), documents their input, then proceeds with implementation.

 

4. Develop Role-Based and Team-Level Governance Structures

 

Overview: Roles (not titles) are the building blocks of distributed systems. Decisions are linked to roles and updated through team-level governance meetings.

 

Steps:

  • Clarify Role Purpose, Domains, and Accountabilities
  • Use Governance Meetings to Adapt Roles: Regularly review and evolve roles based on what the team needs.
  • Enable Role Rotation or Election (where needed): Helps ensure ownership without hierarchy.

 

Example: In a software development circle, the "Quality Lead" role has decision rights over testing protocols. If gaps arise, the team adjusts the role at the next governance session.

 

5. Build Decision Transparency and Documentation Practices

 

Overview: Transparency is vital in manager-less systems. Every team member needs access to decisions, processes, and rationales.

 

Mechanisms:

  • Decision Logs: Document decisions, who made them, and the reasoning.
  • Shared Dashboards: Track performance metrics and ongoing initiatives.
  • Meeting Notes and Governance Records: Store outcomes of tactical and governance meetings.

 

Example: A self-organized customer success team uses a shared document to log all pricing exceptions they approve, including customer background and rationale.

 

6. Develop Team Capability for Conflict Resolution and Facilitation

 

Overview: Without a boss to mediate, teams need tools to navigate disagreement and misalignment themselves.

 

Capabilities to Build:

  • Peer Mediation and Conflict Protocols
  • Facilitation Skills for Meetings
  • Emotional Intelligence and Feedback Training

 

Example: Teams in a design agency rotate the role of "Facilitator" to ensure inclusive discussions. Conflicts are addressed using an agreed-upon protocol for restorative dialogue.

 

7. Foster a Culture of Responsibility and Mutual Trust

 

Overview: No system will work without the right mindset. Distributed decision-making thrives in cultures where accountability is collective and trust is the default.

 

Cultural Anchors:

  • Psychological Safety: People feel safe to take initiative and admit mistakes.
  • Purpose-Driven Behavior: Decisions align with organizational mission.
  • Learning Orientation: Teams adapt based on reflection and feedback.

 

Example: At Morning Star (a tomato processing company), every employee negotiates a "Colleague Letter of Understanding" outlining mutual expectations, enabling peer-based accountability.

 

8. Use Technology to Enable Decentralized Decisions

 

Overview: Digital platforms can help codify, track, and facilitate manager-less decision processes.

 

Suggested Tools:

  • Loomio or Consul: Facilitate collective decision-making
  • GlassFrog: Support Holacracy with role and governance tracking
  • Slack/Teams Channels: For proposal sharing and asynchronous feedback

 

Example: A distributed finance team uses Notion to publish decision logs and policy drafts, allowing team-wide asynchronous comments before finalization.

 

9. Pilot Manager-Less Structures in Select Teams

 

Overview: You don’t need to transform everything at once. Start with motivated teams and scale up based on lessons learned.

 

Pilot Strategy:

  • Choose a High-Trust, Low-Risk Function
  • Provide Training and Coaching Support
  • Track Outcomes and Challenges Transparently

 

Example: A logistics firm starts with a pilot in their internal IT support team, enabling them to make decisions on tool upgrades and process improvements without management oversight.

 

10. Monitor, Learn, and Continuously Improve

 

Overview: Distributed decision-making is evolutionary. Success depends on reflection and adaptation.

 

Continuous Improvement Practices:

  • Regular Retrospectives
  • Anonymous Surveys and Listening Posts
  • Update Decision Protocols Based on Feedback

 

Example: Every quarter, a manufacturing team holds a "decision retrospective" where they discuss what’s working, what’s confusing, and what needs to change in how they self-manage.

 

Final Thoughts

Removing managers from the decision-making process doesn't mean removing structure, strategy, or accountability. It requires a thoughtful shift to new structures and mindsets, emphasizing clarity, shared ownership, and adaptive learning. While the journey may be complex, organizations that embrace these principles often discover untapped creativity, speed, and resilience in their people.

kontakt@hcm-group.pl

883-373-766

Website created in white label responsive website builder WebWave.