HCM GROUP

HCM Group 

HCM Group 

white and black building
07 May 2025

How to Create a Data-Driven 9-Box Grid for HiPo Mapping

An advanced guide for HR leaders to design a strategic, analytics-informed framework for high-potential talent identification and development.

 

Introduction: Moving Beyond Gut Feel with Data-Driven Decisions

The 9-box grid has long been a staple of talent management conversations—an intuitive matrix that plots employees based on current performance and future potential. However, too often it’s misused as a subjective sorting exercise during annual talent reviews. To unlock its full value, organizations must reimagine the 9-box as a data-informed decision-making tool—one that integrates quantitative insights, behavioral analytics, and aligned stakeholder judgment.

This guide shows HR leaders how to build and implement a data-driven 9-box grid that truly supports strategic succession planning and HiPo development—while avoiding the pitfalls of bias, over-simplification, and stagnation.

 

Step 1: Define Performance and Potential – Strategically and Operationally

 

Clarify What You Mean by “Performance”

Avoid vague labels like “high performer.” Instead, ground performance in objective business outcomes and role-specific expectations.

 

Key Metrics to Consider:

  • Goal achievement vs. targets (OKRs/KPIs)
  • Quality of work output
  • Team collaboration and influence
  • Innovation and improvement initiatives
  • Managerial feedback and 360s

 

Example: A sales organization may define performance as exceeding quota, client retention, cross-functional collaboration, and solution-selling skills.

 

Operationalize “Potential” in Your Context

Potential is often the vaguest, yet most critical, dimension. Anchor it in observable behaviors and growth indicators tied to your strategic future.

 

Frameworks to assess potential (choose one or combine):

  • Learning Agility (e.g. Korn Ferry, Lominger)
  • Leadership Benchmarks (e.g. ability to scale, lead cross-functional teams)
  • Growth Indicators (e.g. adaptability, resilience, initiative)

 

Example: A technology company might assess potential using a combination of psychometric tools and behavioral interviews focused on scaling capabilities, emotional regulation under stress, and strategic agility.

 

Step 2: Design the Grid Criteria – Anchor to Data, Not Intuition

 

Grid Overview

The classic 9-box has:

 

  • X-axis = Current performance (low, moderate, high)
  • Y-axis = Future potential (low, moderate, high)

 

Each box should reflect actionable talent strategies, not just labels.

 

 

Low Performance

Moderate Performance

High Performance

High Potential

Watch Closely

Stretch or Coach

Accelerate

Moderate Potential

Develop or Exit

Core Contributor

Strengthen

Low Potential

Misaligned Role

Reassign or Review

Solid Performer

 

Data Anchoring Tips

  • Use numeric scoring systems for both axes (e.g. 1–5 scale)
  • Normalize performance ratings across departments
  • Calibrate potential via structured assessment tools
  • Allow space for manager discussion, but require justification if deviating from the data

 

Example: One financial services firm combined 12 months of performance ratings with Hogan assessments and manager input to calibrate HiPos. Any "Accelerate" rating required a business case aligned with succession goals.

 

Step 3: Select and Integrate Assessment Tools

A robust 9-box requires valid, scalable inputs. Blend qualitative judgment with quantitative diagnostics.

 

Performance Inputs:

  • Performance management data (OKRs, KPIs)
  • 360-degree feedback results
  • Team delivery metrics

 

Potential Inputs:

  • Behavioral or psychometric tools (e.g. Hogan, SHL, Saville, Korn Ferry)
  • Learning agility diagnostics
  • Manager assessments using a structured rubric
  • Internal mobility readiness scores

 

Tip: Avoid relying solely on manager opinions. Use behavior-based interviews, simulations, or game-based assessments where possible.

Case Example: A global consumer brand used a digital “leadership lab” simulation to assess HiPo potential and integrated the results into the 9-box, resulting in more equitable representation across functions and geographies.

 

Step 4: Calibrate Talent – Cross-Functional and Cross-Hierarchical

Avoid siloed assessments. Build cross-functional calibration sessions to create a consistent enterprise-wide view of talent.

 

Calibration Session Structure:

  • Prework: All managers complete performance and potential assessments in advance
  • Facilitated sessions with HR and business leads
  • Review talent by level or function (not just by team)
  • Use talent mapping cards or digital dashboards to track placement
  • Document rationale for each placement

 

Facilitator Tip: Push beyond “he’s just great” or “she’s not ready” – ask for examples tied to criteria. Use pre-defined questions like:

  • “How has this employee demonstrated learning agility?”
  • “What future role do you see them taking in the next 2–3 years?”

 

Step 5: Link to Succession, Development, and Retention Plans

A data-driven 9-box grid is only useful if it drives action. The outputs must be directly linked to strategic people initiatives.

 

Action Plans by Box:

  • Accelerate (High-High):
    • Target for succession pipelines
    • Individualized development plans
    • Exposure to enterprise-wide challenges
  • Stretch or Coach (High Potential / Moderate Performance):
    • Targeted performance coaching
    • Diagnostic of blockers (e.g. manager, environment, readiness)
  • Core Contributor (Moderate-Moderate):
    • Structured skill-building
    • Lateral moves to explore growth paths
  • Reassign/Exit (Low Potential / Moderate or Low Performance):
    • Career conversations
    • Realignment opportunities or exit plans

 

Best Practice: Tie development investments (e.g. coaching, leadership programs) to 9-box placement—and review every 6–12 months to track progress or shifts.

 

Step 6: Communicate Transparently and Ethically

HiPo mapping is sensitive. The communication strategy should reflect ethical standards, confidentiality, and clarity.

 

Guidelines for Communication:

  • Do not disclose 9-box placement directly to employees
  • Focus on development opportunities, not "labels"
  • Offer feedback and coaching regardless of placement
  • Train managers on how to discuss potential with their team members

 

Case Insight: A global logistics firm trained managers to use "development dialogues" based on 9-box outcomes without revealing ratings—focusing instead on growth narratives and actionable pathways.

 

Step 7: Monitor Outcomes and Refresh the Grid Regularly

The 9-box grid should not be a static annual artifact. Treat it as a dynamic map that evolves with data and development.

 

Ongoing Review Practices:

  • Refresh performance and potential data every 6 or 12 months
  • Track HiPo movement across the grid
  • Monitor promotions, retention, and engagement metrics
  • Use analytics to spot underrepresented groups and potential bias patterns

 

Advanced Tip: Use data visualization tools like Power BI or Tableau to monitor 9-box distribution, HiPo retention rates, or readiness pipeline heatmaps.

 

Conclusion: From Grid to Growth Strategy

When built on data, discipline, and dialogue, the 9-box becomes more than a matrix—it becomes a strategic blueprint for identifying, nurturing, and retaining the future leaders of your organization.

For HR leaders, the opportunity lies in elevating the 9-box from opinion to insight, and using it not just to map talent, but to move it forward—with precision, fairness, and purpose.

kontakt@hcm-group.pl

883-373-766

Website created in white label responsive website builder WebWave.