HCM GROUP

HCM Group 

HCM Group 

Introduction: Why This Is the Starting Point

In times of continuous transformation—whether digital, organizational, or strategic—skills are the currency of adaptability. And yet, many companies still operate with outdated job catalogs, disconnected competency models, and inconsistent definitions of capability. As organizations increasingly seek to promote internal mobility, support lateral development, and future-proof their workforce, they face a fundamental need: a company-wide, coherent, and evolving skills taxonomy.

This is not simply an HR project. It is a strategic asset. A well-constructed skills taxonomy serves as the infrastructure for career pathing, enabling role clarity, skill visibility, targeted development, and talent agility. Without it, career frameworks are built on sand.

This guide walks you through how to design, validate, and implement a robust skills taxonomy—starting from a blank page and ending with an institutional asset embedded in your talent ecosystem.

Step 1: Establish the Strategic Context

A skills taxonomy should not be a theoretical exercise. It must be driven by business strategy and grounded in real organizational needs.

Key Actions:

• Clarify the primary driver: Is the taxonomy intended to power internal mobility, learning journeys, workforce planning, or all three?
• Understand upcoming transformations: Are new business models, technologies, or talent shifts on the horizon?
• Align early with key sponsors: Engage senior business and HR leaders to position the taxonomy as an enabler of growth and competitiveness.

Example:
At a global manufacturing firm preparing for automation and supply chain reconfiguration, the taxonomy was designed to anticipate future roles and capabilities—not just document current ones. This foresight prevented redundancy and future-proofed the effort.

Step 2: Define the Scope and Design Principles

Before diving into lists of skills, design the architectural logic.

Core decisions:

• Scope: Company-wide or phased (e.g., critical functions first)?
• Granularity: How specific should skills be—broad categories or precise capabilities?
• Taxonomy depth: Will the framework include skill categories, families, and sub-skills?
• Language: Should the taxonomy reflect a global vocabulary or localized nuances?

Design principles to align on:

• Skills must be behaviorally observable.
• Skills should be agnostic to specific tools or platforms.
• Skills must be durable yet flexible enough to evolve.

Example:
A retail organization with over 30,000 employees decided to start with customer-facing, store-level roles and used real behavioral examples from high-performing employees to define each skill—not academic definitions.

Step 3: Build a Skill Discovery Framework

Rather than guessing, uncover what capabilities are truly needed across the organization. Blend data, insights, and dialogue.

Methods to extract skill inputs:

• Job architecture review: Audit job descriptions and families to detect skill patterns.
• SME workshops: Conduct facilitated discussions with function leaders and top performers.
• Performance data analysis: Examine what capabilities correlate with high performance in key roles.
• Future-readiness check: Include inputs from strategy teams or innovation leads about future roles and disruptions.
• External frameworks: Reference existing models like ESCO (EU), SFIA (tech), or O*NET (US), but don’t copy them blindly.

Practical example:
A fast-scaling biotech company discovered through SME interviews that “cross-functional storytelling” was a critical but unlisted capability among their scientists—vital for regulatory meetings and investor briefings. This insight shaped a new communication skills cluster.

Step 4: Structure the Skills Taxonomy

Once the discovery phase is complete, organize the collected input into a structured, logical framework.

Recommended three-level model:

• Skill Category – broad grouping (e.g., Communication)
• Skill Cluster – sub-domain (e.g., Scientific Storytelling)
• Skill – specific capability (e.g., translating research into non-technical language)

Ensure the taxonomy reflects both core (cross-functional) and functional (role-specific) skills. Consider also tagging skills as:

• Technical vs. behavioral
• Leadership vs. individual contributor
• Emerging vs. foundational

Illustrative snippet (for Product Manager role):

Caution:
Do not duplicate skills under different names. Normalize your vocabulary early to avoid taxonomy bloat.

Step 5: Validate and Refine

Your draft taxonomy must be stress-tested across real use cases before being operationalized.

Validation practices:

• Run pilot role assessments using the taxonomy—do skills align with reality?
• Conduct feedback sessions with business leaders and employees.
• Test for redundancy, overlap, or ambiguity.
• Ensure DEI sensitivity in language and concepts.

Case-in-point:
A global insurance firm found that “resilience” and “stress management” appeared in multiple clusters with different meanings. These were merged into a single skill with context-based examples, reducing confusion.

Step 6: Operationalize the Taxonomy

Once validated, the taxonomy needs to be brought to life—not remain a document on a shared drive.

Key deliverables:

• A searchable, digital skill library accessible to HR and managers
• Clear behavioral definitions and proficiency levels (e.g., basic to expert)
• Integration plan with job architecture, performance management, and learning platforms

Make the taxonomy usable by:

• Embedding it in career pathing tools
• Aligning it with development offerings and learning journeys
• Leveraging it in talent reviews and succession planning

Example:
One organization built an internal portal that allowed employees to explore roles and see what skills were required, their current proficiency, and targeted learning resources—driven entirely by the skills taxonomy.

Step 7: Maintain and Govern the Taxonomy

Like any core asset, a skills taxonomy needs active governance and continuous evolution.

Recommendations:

• Assign taxonomy ownership to the Talent COE or HR Strategy function
• Set update cycles (e.g., every 12–18 months)
• Create a “new skill intake” process so business functions can propose additions
• Use analytics from talent marketplace tools or learning platforms to track emerging skills

Governance example:
A professional services firm uses a quarterly forum where HRBPs submit change requests to the taxonomy, which are reviewed by a central taxonomy board and updated biannually.

Conclusion: More Than a List — A Strategic Infrastructure

A skills taxonomy is not an output—it is an enabler. It allows HR to move from abstract talent conversations to evidence-based, capability-focused decisions. It empowers employees to chart meaningful careers. It equips leaders to build future-ready teams.

Done well, a taxonomy becomes invisible in its ubiquity: showing up in job design, mobility discussions, leadership development, and daily talent decisions.

This is where career pathing begins. The architecture must come first—clear, scalable, dynamic, and strategically aligned.

Terms of Use

Privacy Policyp

kontakt@hcm-group.pl

883-373-766

Website created in white label responsive website builder WebWave.