HCM GROUP
HCM Group
HCM Group
Building on identification by highlighting capability gaps and crafting targeted development actions
Introduction: From Identification to Readiness
Identifying successors is only the starting line. The real strategic value lies in preparing them. Too often, organizations designate successors without a systematic process for understanding what stands between “identified” and “ready.” An effective HR leader must ensure that successor slates are not just lists—but development journeys.
This guide focuses on how to rigorously assess the development gaps of succession candidates and link those insights to high-impact, targeted development actions that accelerate readiness.
1. Begin with a Clear, Future-Oriented Success Profile
You cannot assess a gap without a benchmark. The success profile defines what “ready” looks like—not just based on today’s job, but on where the role is heading.
To craft a high-quality success profile:
This profile becomes the measuring stick for successor assessments.
2. Assess Successors Holistically, Not Just by Competency Scores
Gap assessment should be more than a check-the-box skills matrix. Instead, build a multidimensional view using diverse inputs:
Example: A succession candidate for a regional GM role scored highly on leadership behaviors but had never led a turnaround or scaled operations. The gap was not in competence, but in experience under specific conditions—which shaped the development path.
3. Translate Gaps into Development Objectives, Not Just Labels
Labeling someone as “not ready” is not enough. HR must translate that diagnosis into a concrete, developmental agenda.
Instead of:
“Needs to improve strategic thinking.”
Reframe as:
“Needs exposure to enterprise-level decision-making and multi-market strategy formulation.”
Development objectives should:
4. Co-Create Development Actions with the Business
Development is not owned by HR alone. It requires shared ownership with line managers, mentors, and the business.
High-impact actions go beyond training:
Example: A Head of HR preparing to become CHRO was asked to co-lead the digital strategy board for 6 months. This addressed her development gap in digital fluency and boardroom dynamics.
5. Ensure Alignment with Time-to-Readiness and Succession Risk
Not all successors require the same investment. Your approach should be guided by two variables:
Use this matrix to prioritize development:
Low Readiness |
High Readiness |
|
Low Urgency |
Slow-burn development projects |
Targeted stretch experiences |
High Urgency |
Intensive coaching, backfill exposure |
Emergency backfill preparation |
This ensures that both timing and risk are managed systematically—not just reactively.
6. Embed Review Mechanisms to Track Development Progress
Development plans lose power if not reviewed regularly. Set up structured checkpoints:
Ask:
You are managing a portfolio of leadership futures—treat it with the same rigor as a business investment.
7. Balance Development Rigor with Retention Strategy
Successor development is not only about capability—it also signals commitment. Ignoring development or delaying movement can cause high-potential successors to disengage or leave.
To mitigate retention risk:
Example: A successor felt discouraged after being passed over for a COO role. The HRBP scheduled a direct conversation with the CEO, who acknowledged the potential and committed to specific development actions. The result: The successor stayed and was promoted 18 months later—with a higher level of engagement.
Conclusion: From Gaps to Growth
Assessing development gaps is not about highlighting what leaders lack—it’s about building what they’ll need. A succession plan is only as strong as the developmental clarity and commitment behind it. By anchoring assessments in strategy, translating them into real actions, and reviewing progress with discipline, HR leaders turn a list of names into a future-ready leadership bench.
kontakt@hcm-group.pl
883-373-766
Website created in white label responsive website builder WebWave.